Highway Profit VS Fin Funds: battle of investment projects

September 7, 2010 - 9:29am | Articles | Investment industry |
| More
  
Highway Profit VS Fin Funds: battle of investment projects

Today we will look at two investment projects which are http://highwayprofit.com and http://www.finfunds.com/ and make our analysis on nine different criteria of the investment programs such as the features, the security, and their potential to make you money online and so forth.

hwplogo

Initially, the company was founded in the end of 2007 as a private close-ended investment fund. Summing up the work of 2009, the Company founders decided to open this opportunity to everyone.

finlogo

Financial Funds Corp is a registered investment company and advisor in Finland. FinFunds - Mutual Funds is a company that pools the assets of thousands of investors together in one portfolio.

1. Investment plans

Highwayprofit offers only one type of daily interest plan. The plan gives 2% daily for 100 days with a minimum initial deposit of $25.

Finfunds offers two types of daily interest plan. The plans give 1.9% and 2.2% daily for one year with a minimum initial deposit of $5.

Winner: Based on both investment plans, we prefer the investment plans which offered by Highwayprofit because the daily rate is higher and the cycle plan can be completed within shorter period of time frame.

2. The availability of website log in security features

A. Highwayprofit

Virtual keyboard – NO
IP sensitivity detection – YES
Pin code – NO
SMS authentication – NO
Others – NO

hwpsecurity

B. Finfunds

Virtual keyboard – NO
IP sensitivity detection – NO
Pin code – NO
SMS authentication – NO
Others - NO

Winner: Definitely Highwayprofit is the winner when this investment program implements one type of website log in security features which is an IP sensitivity detection.

3. Website security features

A. Highwayprofit

SSL encryption – NO
DDoS protection – NO
Dedicated server - NO

B. Finfunds

SSL encryption – NO
DDoS protection – NO
Dedicated server - NO

Winner: This is a category that looks bad to both investment programs when none of them implement any type of website security features.

4. Whois information

A. Highwayprofit

hwpwhois

B. Finfunds

finwhois

Winner: Even though Finfunds has its whois detail available to the public, the detail is incomplete. As a result, we do not pick any of them as the winner.

5. Interfaces of the websites

A. Highwayprofit

Design - Moderate, ready made template
Menu – Sufficient
Account registration – Simple
Log in process - Convenience
Member’s section – Convenience

hwppage

This investment program uses only a moderate looking ready made design template for the website and the script used with this investment program is just a ready made one too. The contents are quite disorganized. This investment program also does not have its own logo.

hwpmember

B. Finfunds

Design - Good, customized
Menu – Insufficient
Account registration – Simple
Log in process - Convenience
Member’s section – Convenience

finpage

This investment program uses a good looking customized design template for the website but with a ready made script that has been integrated to it. Some of the text are written in a small size of font. This investment program website does not have a rating page.

finmember

Winner: We choose Finfunds as the winner when the website uses a customized design template that makes this investment program looks attractive and professional.

6. Referral programs

A. Highwayprofit

3% - 5% for every deposit you refer.

B. Finfunds

5% for every deposit you refer.

Winner: Obviously Finfunds wins the referral program category when this investment program offers a 5% referral commission regardless of how many referrers you have.

7. Contact Information

A. Highwayprofit

Address – NO
Phone no – NO
Email – YES
Live support - NO

B. Finfunds

Address – YES
Phone no – YES
Email – YES
Live support - NO

Winner: The winner for this category is Finfunds as this investment program website provides 3 out of 4 contact information and options to the members. There was someone answered our call when we dialed up the number.

8. Language availability

A. Highwayprofit

English only

B. Finfunds

English only

Winner: There is no winner for this category.

9. Rating and monitors

A. Highwayprofit

Hyipinvestment – not monitored
Hyip.com – ranking: #82, sum invested: $150, status: paying
Hyipexplorer – ranking: #68, sum invested: $200, status: paying
Hyipmonitor – ranking: #26, sum invested: not available, status: paying
Goldpoll - ranking: #192, sum invested: not available, status: paying
Hyipbanker - ranking: #16, sum invested: not available, status: paying

B. Finfunds

Hyipinvestment – ranking: #39, sum invested: $350, status: paying
Hyip.com – ranking: #80, sum invested: $150, status: paying
Hyipexplorer – ranking: #72, sum invested: $200, status: paying
Hyipmonitor – ranking: #24, sum invested: not available, status: paying
Goldpoll – ranking: #170, sum invested: not available, status: paying
Hyipbanker - ranking: #33, sum invested: not available, status: paying

Winner: This category belongs to Finfunds when this investment program is monitored on 6 out of 6 of the above ratings and monitors and all 6 have paying status.

Conclusion: Based on our compare and contrast analysis on two investment projects, Highwayprofit wins in 2 categories while Finfunds wins in 4 categories. Therefore, it seems like Finfunds is a better investment program against its opponent. However, both investment programs were newly launched. Highwayprofit was started more than a week ago while Finfunds has been running for more than two weeks now.




RSS feed Subscribe to Ecommerce Journal RSS feed

0 points

   Tell us what topics you want to be covered in the Ecommerce Journal?  
Image CAPTCHA
  


Comments on Highway Profit VS Fin Funds: battle of investment projects




Similar Articles on Ecommerce Journal by sections

FIGURES
PAYMENT SYSTEMS
BANKS
PLASTIC CARDS
ECOMMERCE-CHECKED
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY
FRAUD
ANALYTICS
OTHER THEMES
INTERVIEWS
LAW ASPECTS